<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marc Lucas &#187; Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marclucas.co.uk/category/writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marclucas.co.uk</link>
	<description>Marketing Consultant &#38; Commercial Facilitator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is 120 the new 140 or is 100 the new 140?</title>
		<link>http://marclucas.co.uk/2010/01/is-120-the-new-140-or-is-100-the-new-140/</link>
		<comments>http://marclucas.co.uk/2010/01/is-120-the-new-140-or-is-100-the-new-140/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lucas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marclucas.co.uk/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to my last Twitter search this revelation has been going around the Twitterverse for the last 9 days.
The majority vote seems to be going with 120 but  Iconic88 has suggested that &#8220;100 is the new 140 for massive retweetlove&#8221;, I tend to agree with the &#8220;Chief Happiness Officer on Twitter, Friend, Ideas Evangelist, Relationships [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marclucas.co.uk/2010/01/is-120-the-new-140-or-is-100-the-new-140/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention mommy bloggers: the FTC isn&#8217;t coming after you &#124; Blog &#124; Econsultancy</title>
		<link>http://marclucas.co.uk/2010/01/attention-mommy-bloggers-the-ftc-isnt-coming-after-you-blog-econsultancy/</link>
		<comments>http://marclucas.co.uk/2010/01/attention-mommy-bloggers-the-ftc-isnt-coming-after-you-blog-econsultancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Lucas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marclucas.co.uk/2010/01/attention-mommy-bloggers-the-ftc-isnt-coming-after-you-blog-econsultancy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention mommy bloggers: the FTC isn&#8217;t coming after you &#124; Blog &#124; Econsultancy

The Federal Trade Commission came under fire when it released new disclosure guidelines on sponsorships this fall. Most vocal were bloggers concerned that anyone online could be fined up to $11,000 for disclosure violations. 
More . . .

Blogged with the Flock Browser
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marclucas.co.uk/2010/01/attention-mommy-bloggers-the-ftc-isnt-coming-after-you-blog-econsultancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
